Understanding CSRF Attacks and Building Effective Defenses
CSRF attacks exploit browser-server trust to execute unauthorized actions on authenticated users by tricking browsers into sending forged requests. Implement token synchronization, SameSite cookies, and custom headers to break the attack chain and protect state-changing operations.
Published October 31, 2025
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks exploit a fundamental weakness in how web applications handle authenticated requests. Despite being a well-documented vulnerability for over two decades, CSRF jumped from 9th to 4th place in 2024's list of most dangerous software weaknesses. The persistence of this threat stems from its architectural nature—it exploits the implicit trust between browsers and servers rather than implementation bugs that can be easily patched.
Organizations that fail to implement proper CSRF defenses risk unauthorized fund transfers, account takeovers, and administrative compromises that can cascade through entire systems. In this blog, we will examine how CSRF attacks work, why traditional authentication fails to stop them, and deploy six proven mitigation strategies that protect modern web applications.
» Looking for an effective security solution for your business? Contact us
Understanding CSRF Attacks
CSRF is an attack that takes advantage of the trust between a user’s browser and a web application. When you’re logged in, your browser automatically includes authentication details, like cookies, with each request. CSRF manipulates this process by tricking the browser into sending unauthorized requests that the application treats as legitimate.
The application assumes any request coming from an authenticated session is genuine. This allows attackers to perform actions like fund transfers, password changes, or profile edits without the user’s consent.
» Have a startup? Here are some cyber tips for your startup business
Find CSRF Risks Before Hackers Do
GRSee's penetration testing identifies session vulnerabilities and provides clear remediation steps your developers can implement.
How CSRF Exploits Trust
When explaining CSRF to security professionals, several nuances are worth highlighting:
- The attack is technical in execution (through crafted HTML or JavaScript) but architectural in root cause, tied to how the web handles authentication.
- The same-origin policy doesn’t stop requests from being sent — it only prevents reading of the response.
- CSRF can be chained with other vulnerabilities like XSS or SQL injection to cause greater damage, especially when targeting users with administrative privileges.
» Schedule a penetration test with GRSee to identify and remediate CSRF vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them
Why Session-Based Authentication Fails Against CSRF
Traditional session-based authentication fails to stop CSRF because it relies too heavily on implicit trust between browsers and web servers. Browsers are designed to automatically include authentication details — like session cookies or tokens — with every request to a site the user is logged into.
Attackers exploit this behavior by tricking a victim’s browser into sending a forged request through a malicious link or hidden form. Since the browser automatically appends the valid session cookie, the server treats the request as legitimate. It cannot tell whether the user intended to perform that action or not.
This is what makes CSRF particularly dangerous. It exploits the “confused deputy” problem — the assumption that the browser, acting on behalf of the user, will always represent the user’s true intent.
When that assumption fails, attackers can execute unauthorized, state-changing operations that compromise the entire web application.
» Take your cybersecurity to the next level by implementing the CIA triad
6 CSRF Mitigation Strategies
CSRF attacks take advantage of how browsers automatically include user credentials with requests. Here are several CSRF mitigation strategies, along with practical guidance for implementing each.
1. Token Synchronization
Token synchronization is one of the most common and effective CSRF defenses. In this method, the server generates a unique and unpredictable token for each user session or request. That token is embedded in forms or AJAX requests and validated by the server whenever a request is made.
When implemented per request, tokens significantly limit an attacker’s window of opportunity by expiring quickly.
- Always generate tokens using a cryptographically secure random function to ensure they can’t be guessed.
- Validate every state-changing request against the stored session token before processing it.
- Record all mismatched or missing tokens in server logs for potential investigation.
2. Double-Submit Cookie Pattern
The double-submit cookie technique protects against CSRF without requiring the server to store token states. It works by sending the same random value twice — once as a cookie and again as a hidden form field or request parameter. The server then checks whether these two values match.
Because browsers restrict the manipulation of cookies from other origins, this method provides a stateless and lightweight protection layer. Adding encryption or hash-based message authentication codes (HMAC) strengthens it even further by ensuring cookie integrity.
- Use strong, randomly generated values for both the cookie and the request parameter.
- Implement HMAC or encrypted cookies so that attackers can’t forge valid pairs.
- Reject any request where the cookie and request parameter values do not align.
» Make sure you understand the difference between asymmetric and symmetric encryption
3. Custom Request Headers
Custom request headers are a practical mitigation for API and AJAX endpoints. Browsers restrict scripts from setting custom headers in cross-origin requests unless explicitly permitted through CORS, which makes this technique effective against CSRF.
- Configure all AJAX or API calls to include a custom header that is checked server-side.
- Enforce strict CORS rules so unauthorized domains can’t spoof headers.
- Combine this technique with token validation for stronger end-to-end protection.
4. Requiring User Interaction
Adding user interaction checkpoints provides an extra layer of defense for critical operations. Features such as CAPTCHA challenges, confirmation screens, or secondary authentication (like re-entering a password) ensure that actions cannot be completed automatically by a forged request.
Although this technique can impact user experience, it is particularly useful for sensitive operations that change account information or initiate transactions.
- Apply interaction-based validation only to high-risk functions such as fund transfers or password changes.
- Combine visual confirmation steps (like CAPTCHA) with re-authentication for maximum protection.
- Design the flow to minimize friction for legitimate users while preventing automated abuse.
5. Same-Site Cookies
Same-site cookies add another layer of protection by limiting when browsers can attach cookies to requests made from external websites. By setting the SameSite attribute to Strict or Lax, developers can ensure cookies are only sent when requests originate from the same domain.
This prevents most third-party requests — such as hidden forms or malicious scripts hosted elsewhere — from carrying session cookies that could authorize CSRF attempts.
- Apply
SameSite=Strictfor sensitive actions such as admin logins or financial transactions. - Use
SameSite=Laxwhen minimal cross-site functionality, such as third-party sign-ins, is needed. - Always pair the SameSite attribute with HTTPS to prevent cookie theft or session hijacking.
6. Continuous Security Testing
Even when CSRF protections are properly implemented, ongoing changes in code and dependencies can introduce new vulnerabilities. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) helps catch these issues early by continuously scanning web applications for weak points.
Integrating DAST tools into the development lifecycle ensures that security checks become part of every build, rather than an afterthought.
- Run automated DAST scans regularly, especially after major updates or dependency changes.
- Review results promptly and treat CSRF-related alerts as priority issues.
- Combine automated scanning with manual code reviews for deeper coverage and context.
» Exposed ports and weak firewalls invite attackers. Identify security gaps before attackers do
Evaluating Framework-Level CSRF Protections
When assessing web frameworks for CSRF security in enterprise environments, the focus is on built-in protections and how effectively they prevent attacks.
Frameworks are typically evaluated on the following criteria:
- Token implementation: The most reliable method is the synchronizer token pattern, where the framework generates a unique, unpredictable token for each user session. Tokens must be cryptographically secure; poorly generated random values can compromise the system.
- Support for stateless APIs: Modern architectures often rely on stateless APIs. Frameworks should support alternatives to per-session tokens, such as the Double-Submit Cookie pattern or custom headers like
X-CSRF-Token. - Secure token handling: Tokens should never be sent in URLs, as they can be leaked via the
Refererheader or logs. Proper frameworks ensure tokens are submitted only in request bodies or headers. - Usability and state management: Token management can follow per-request or per-session models. Per-request tokens are more secure but can interfere with features like the browser’s “Back” button. Per-session tokens are easier for users but slightly increase the attack window.
- Vulnerability coverage: A good framework prevents common flaws such as state-changing GET requests, reducing opportunities for CSRF exploitation.
» Don't wait for a breach—validate your CSRF defenses now with GRSee's comprehensive security assessment
Timeline for Implementing CSRF Defenses
Rolling out comprehensive CSRF protections across an enterprise application portfolio is a multi-phase effort, with timelines varying based on application complexity and current security maturity. Retrofitting legacy systems is particularly time-consuming, while new applications can integrate protections more efficiently during development.
The effort is influenced by several factors:
- Code refactoring: Removing or redesigning state-changing GET requests, which are inherently vulnerable, can be labor-intensive.
- State management and scalability: Implementing robust anti-CSRF mechanisms like the synchronizer token pattern may require managing large volumes of session-to-token mappings, especially under high traffic.
- Developer education: Teams need training on proper anti-CSRF practices, including token generation, validation, and secure request handling.
» Don’t leave it too late: Explore the disasters you can avoid by proactively addressing your cybersecurity needs
How GRSee Can Help You
Defending against CSRF requires more than implementing token validation—it demands comprehensive security architecture and continuous validation. At GRSee, we conduct penetration testing that specifically targets session management vulnerabilities, assess your current CSRF protections across all application endpoints, and provide actionable remediation guidance that integrates with your development workflow.
Our security experts help you build defense-in-depth strategies that combine multiple mitigation techniques while maintaining usability.
» Contact us to schedule a security assessment that identifies CSRF risks before attackers exploit them
FAQs
We use a CSRF token. Can this defense be completely bypassed by an attacker?
Yes, the most serious limitation is that Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) can defeat all CSRF mitigation techniques. If a site is vulnerable to XSS, an attacker can execute malicious scripts in the victim's browser, read the genuine CSRF token directly from the page, and include it in their fraudulent request.
Tokens can also be bypassed if they are generated using poorly generated random values (e.g., iterative numbers or dates) that an attacker might infer. Therefore, token protection must be coupled with rigorous XSS mitigation.
How do we implement token protection for stateless APIs (AJAX)?
For stateless Single Page Applications (SPAs) and APIs that avoid <form> tags, developers should use custom request headers. This approach is well-suited for AJAX endpoints and is often preferred as it maintains usability. The client (e.g., using Angular or React) reads a CSRF token from a cookie and attaches it to state-changing requests using a custom header (e.g., X-CSRF-Token).
For true statelessness, the token must be encrypted, containing a unique user identifier, a timestamp for expiration, and a cryptographic nonce.
How can my organization maintain CSRF protection over time?
Continuous vigilance is essential. Implement dynamic security testing (DAST), conduct regular audits, and integrate CSRF checks into the SDLC.
Combined with ongoing developer education and monitoring, these practices help ensure protections remain effective as applications evolve.
